Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Republicans selling off public Land

Before

Image result for beautiful forest aerial

After


Image result for housing development aerial


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jan/31/public-lands-sell-congress-bureau-management-chaffetz

Note: I do realize that these images are of different biomes, but you should get the point. The land is meant to be preserved for the plants, animals, and biodiversity. It is meant to be protected and ensure sustainability. It is not meant to be a beautiful land for a developer to destroy.




Trumps Refugee Ban

Image result for trump's refugee ban


Trumps Refugee Ban is quite controversial. Here is his policy and we will analyze it. 

* Trump has banned all immigration (regardless of visa, status, and refugee) from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia for 90 days.

*Trump has banned refugee admission from these 7 countries for 120 days. 

This is his policy. Nothing more, nothing less. I agree with it.

First of all, the very definition of a refugee has changed over time. Germany for example, has admitted more than 1 million refugees in 2015 alone. Simultaneously, crimes such as rape, murder, violence, assault, and robbery have skyrocketed. For example, the crime rate when up 80% from 2015 to 2014. Migrants in 2015 alone, committed by migrants an at least an outstanding 400,000 crimes.

Trump is trying to protect the US. It is irrefutable the refugees from Muslim countries increase crime and terrorism rates. For instance, Brussels, Nice, Paris have been commited with Radical Islamic intentions. And the highest population of radical extremists are from Muslim countries. Trump is trying to prevent the infamous terrorist attacks in Europe from occurring in the U.S and prevent crime.

Also, refugees are expensive to handle. For instance, in the U.S each refugee gets $ 1000 of spending money in addition to food, medicine, housing, education, services.... The office of refugee resettlement spends $ 1.56 billion each year. If anything, Trump should not slash the EPA but this agency.

Furthermore, we do not benefit from having refugees. We do not benefit economically, socially, and politically, so why should we let them in ? Also, refugees should not flee but be patriotic and fight for their country. They, need to stop acting like wimps.

Trump is trying to address all these problems mentioned above, and it will be effective.

Liberal News Organizations vs Scrutiny. 

The Atlantic said: "Trump's immigration ban is already harming U.S science.....Iranian scientists have been a major boon to everything from Mars exploration to Ebola-fighting to advanced mathematics."

This is BS. In fact, the U.S has 336 Nobel Prize winners and out of all the Islamic Countries their are only 2 Nobel Prize winners. Also, all Islamic countries total at least 1 billion people and the U.S has about 330 million, so..... their scientific advancement is seriously sub par. This is because, there is no separation of Church and State in these countries, making religion/state superior to science.  So WTF is this article saying. 

USA TODAY said: "The libertarian Cato Institute estimates that the chances of a refugee killing an American in a terror attack are extremely remote: one in 3.6 billion annually."

This is seriously misleading. This does not make any sense. It basically said that if the U.S takes 3.6 billion refugees, we would have on average 1 terrorist attack each year. This seems extremely low, just by intuition. 3.6 billion people is around half the human population on the EARTH.